Cited by 305Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesForest ecology and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE INFLUENCE OF PRODUCTIVITY ON THE SPECIES RICHNESS OF PLANTS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Despite much scrutiny the relationship between productivity and species richness remains controversial, and there is little agreement about causal processes. We present the results of a survey of 159 productivity-plant species richness (P-PSR) relationships from 131 published studies. We critically assessed each study with respect to experimental design and for the appropriateness of the surrogates used for productivity. We were able to accept only 60 of the reported relationships as robust tests of the P-PSR relationship and a further 18 as robust tests of the biomass species richness relationship. Previous analyses have found that unimodal P-PSR relationships predominate. In contrast, we found that, in studies that used data of continental to global extent, all P-PSR relationships were positive regardless of grain, that almost all were also positive in data sets of regional extent, and that unimodal relationships were not dominant even in studies of fine grain or small spatial extent. Our results differ substantially from previous meta-analyses because previous studies have included a large number of studies that do not meet basic experimental design criteria for objectively testing P-PSR relationships. These results have important implications for theory that attempts to explain species richness patterns. We critically review four dominant theories in light of our results and develop new falsifiable predictions of relationship from these theories at both small and large spatial scales.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1234:tiopot]2.0.co;2

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. R. E. Ricklefs, and D. Schluter .1993 .Species diversity: regional and historical influences .Pages350 -363 in R. E. Ricklefs, and D. Schluter, editors.Species diversity in ecological communities University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  2. D. H. Wright, D. J. Currie, and B. D. Maurer .1993 .Energy supply and patterns of species richness on local and regional scales .Pages66 -74 in R. E. Ricklefs, and D. Schluter, editors.Species diversity in ecological communities University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Gillman, L. N., & Wright, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05
Volume
87
Issue
5
Pages
1234-1243
ISSN
0012-9658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120326925
Cited by
305
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
plant species richness, biomass, experimental design, spatial scale, biodiversity gradients
MeSH terms
Climate, Biological Evolution, Plants, Population Dynamics, Species Specificity, Ecosystem, Biomass, Biodiversity, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE INFLUENCE OF PRODUCTIVITY ON THE SPECIES RICHNESS OF PLANTS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B1234:tiopot%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Gillman, L. N., & Wright, S. D. (2006). THE INFLUENCE OF PRODUCTIVITY ON THE SPECIES RICHNESS OF PLANTS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B1234%3Atiopot%5D2.0.co%3B2